Pro-Abortion Group Targets 14 to 25 Year Olds

Alright, take a step back and look at how this is being framed, because there’s a lot going on here beyond just a campus event.

So here’s the core of it: a group hosted an “abortion support doula” training at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, aimed at people ages 14 to 24. That age range alone is what’s setting off alarms for critics—because now you’re not just talking about college students, you’re potentially pulling in high schoolers too.

Now, what is this training actually about? According to the invite, it’s focused on teaching people how to support someone before, during, and after an abortion—emotionally, physically, even logistically. That includes things like being present during the process, helping coordinate care, or just acting as a support system. The term “doula” is usually associated with childbirth, but here it’s being applied in a completely different context.

And that’s where the real divide shows up.

Supporters of this kind of program argue it’s about access and support—making sure people aren’t going through something difficult alone, especially younger individuals who may not have strong support systems. They frame it as peer-led, community-based help, not medical intervention.

Critics, on the other hand, see something else entirely. They argue this is part of a broader effort to normalize abortion and actively recruit younger people into advocacy roles. The language used—“youth-led,” “campus organizing,” “building networks”—doesn’t read like a one-off workshop to them. It reads like movement-building.

Then there’s the money angle. Some abortion doulas work for free, others charge hundreds of dollars, which adds another layer—this isn’t just ideological, it can also be a paid role in certain cases.

And zoom out a bit further, and you see why this is landing the way it is right now.

You’ve got ongoing political fights over abortion access, funding battles involving organizations like Planned Parenthood, and data showing abortion numbers holding steady or increasing depending on how they’re measured. Drop a youth-focused training program into that environment, and it’s almost guaranteed to spark a reaction.

So what you’re really looking at isn’t just a training session—it’s a flashpoint.

One side sees support networks and education. The other sees normalization and recruitment.

And because it involves young people, the intensity of that debate goes up immediately.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here