Squatter Returns To $2.3m DC Home Days After Being Jailed

In a leafy Bethesda neighborhood where homes sell for millions and quiet streets rarely make headlines, one property has become the center of a months-long legal and political firestorm.

Tameika Goode, 40, who was charged last year with trespassing and burglary after allegedly taking over a $2.3 million mansion in the Washington, D.C., suburbs, is back inside the home after spending less than two weeks behind bars, according to the Baltimore Sun.

The case first came to light more than a year ago when 19-year-old neighbor Ian Chen reported the situation to Montgomery County police. Chen, now a student at William & Mary, said he was stunned to see the property occupied under what authorities later described as unlawful circumstances.

“Less than two weeks of being incarcerated, Tameika Goode is back in the house,” Chen told the Sun. Frustrated by the drawn-out legal process, he has since begun urging Maryland lawmakers to tighten statutes governing squatting.

“I feel they should be a lot more proactive,” Chen told WBFF-TV. “I am honestly shocked this hasn’t been fixed 10, 20 years ago… especially recently, in every community across the state.”

The legal battle surrounding Goode remains ongoing. During a recent court appearance, she brushed off reporters, telling one to “Get out of my face.” Reports indicate that when she returned to the property following her brief incarceration, some of her belongings had been placed outside.

Goode’s attorney, Alex Webster, has argued that the situation hinges on a title dispute. He told the Baltimore Sun that his client “did her research” and determined the property was under the control of a group facing title issues.

“She found out that a certain property was under the control of a certain group — there was a title issue,” Webster said. “Due to the title issue, she was able to assume the property under squatter rights.”

While he acknowledged there is no specific statute labeled “squatter’s rights,” Webster referenced broader legal doctrines that can, under limited circumstances, allow individuals to claim rights to a property — typically through adverse possession, a process that usually requires years of continuous, open occupancy under strict conditions.

For now, the Bethesda mansion remains occupied as the courts sort through competing claims. But for neighbors watching the saga unfold, the case has become less about one property and more about whether existing laws are equipped to handle a growing wave of high-value home disputes.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here