Wade Testifies Before Congress

Well, well, well—what a tangled web we weave. Nathan Wade, the so-called “special prosecutor” in the Fulton County case against Donald Trump, can’t seem to remember the details of anything important when it comes to his meetings with the Biden White House.

Now, for a man who raked in nearly $700,000 to lead one of the most politically charged cases in modern history, you’d think he could at least recall a few details about his White House interactions. But instead, when grilled by the House Judiciary Committee, he gave 58 responses of “I don’t remember.”

This is the same guy who was tapped to prosecute Donald Trump despite his career as a divorce lawyer with hardly any experience in criminal cases. Yet, here he was, front and center in a high-stakes election interference case, allegedly thanks to his cozy relationship with District Attorney Fani Willis—a relationship that went beyond the courtroom, as it turns out.

For a man in such an important role, Wade sure had a lot of gaps in his memory. He couldn’t recall who attended White House meetings or even whether they were in-person or over the phone. But what he did remember was submitting invoices—one of them for a $2,000 meeting with White House counsel in D.C. Is it just a coincidence that a case against Trump, planned by Willis even before she officially took office, involved multiple meetings with White House officials from Biden’s administration? If this doesn’t raise red flags, what does?

House Republicans are now investigating whether this Willis-Wade duo profited from prosecuting Trump and whether the White House had more influence than meets the eye. Let’s not forget: Wade admitted to meeting with attorneys involved in the House January 6 committee—another Democrat-led crusade against Trump. And what did he bill for? Hours of research and interviews, all with the magical line “I don’t recall” stamped on every question about specifics.

And here’s the kicker: Wade, the lead prosecutor, admitted to having almost zero understanding of the RICO charges central to the case. He had to take a crash course from the so-called “godfather of RICO.” How is someone in charge of one of the most prominent cases in U.S. history learning on the fly from someone else’s book on the subject?

It’s hard not to see this as a coordinated political effort. Wade’s selective amnesia, combined with the timeline of events—prosecuting Trump while Biden’s team watches closely from the wings—paints quite the picture of a political hit job. Meanwhile, the actual merits of the case? Well, those seem to be just as flimsy as Wade’s recollection.

If the case against Trump was so strong, why does it seem to be crumbling under the weight of secret meetings, conflicts of interest, and prosecutors who clearly aren’t qualified to lead? And why, after all of this, is Fani Willis still desperately trying to revive charges that are already being tossed out?

The more you look at this mess, the more it stinks. However, for Wade and Willis, the smell of corruption seems to be just part of the job description.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here