Dem Senators Comments On Protests

The dust has settled after the so-called “No Kings” weekend of protests, and what’s left in its wake is a glorious mix of viral videos, empty rhetoric, and Democrats nervously chewing their fingernails over what their activist base might demand next.

Because let’s be honest: it was a spectacle.

From tie-dyed Boomers reciting half-remembered slogans from their Woodstock days to TikTok-infected Gen Zers ranting about “authoritarianism” while livestreaming uninterrupted from their iPhones, the protests were equal parts absurdity and irony. They screamed about tyranny in public, loudly and without consequence, in a country where free speech remains very much intact. In real tyrannies, by the way, people shrieking “No Kings” in the streets don’t trend—they disappear.

But reason was never invited to this party.

The real story here isn’t the shrieking—it’s the fallout. Because while most of America laughed, Democratic leadership didn’t. Behind closed doors, they’re panicking. The “No Kings” protests may not have changed hearts and minds across the country, but they sent a very loud message to Senate Democrats: Do not compromise, or we’ll come for your seat next.

And that message is landing. Hard.

The ongoing Schumer Shutdown—now dragging into its third week—has less to do with Republicans than it does with Democrats cannibalizing themselves. A growing number of Democrat senators, particularly those from purple or vulnerable states, are now caught between two fires: a White House trying to restore function, and a base that wants nothing less than scorched earth.

“They’re terrified of getting the guillotine,” one Democratic insider told The Hill ahead of the protests. No, not literally—but politically. For today’s progressive base, “insufficient resistance” is a greater sin than legislative paralysis. And voting to reopen the government—even temporarily—is seen as betrayal.

So far, only three senators from the Democrat caucus have dared to back a clean re-opening: John Fetterman, Catherine Cortez Masto, and Independent Angus King. The rest are locked in place, afraid that crossing their activist base will mean a primary challenge—or worse, getting replaced by someone even further to the left. As one senator bluntly put it: “People are going to get hammered.”


And the irony? If they cave to the mob, they won’t be saving their careers—they’ll be handing them over to fringe activists who don’t have to answer to working-class voters. If they don’t? They risk being replaced by someone who can’t win a general election anyway. That’s the trap they’ve built for themselves.

Because this is what happens when a party makes peace with its most unhinged elements. You don’t get to call off the mob once it’s been summoned. You don’t get to hand out pitchforks and then ask people to please not poke anyone important. You built this monster, now you get to feed it—or get eaten by it.

And let’s not ignore the schadenfreude. Watching elected officials who’ve spent years placating radicals now squirm under the weight of their own “resistance” machine? That’s a karmic masterpiece. As the saying goes: when you dine with the devil, bring a long spoon. But Democrats? They’re face down in the soup.

And while we laugh at the AI-generated guillotine memes and the signs accusing Trump of crimes against fashion or weather patterns or whatever the hysteria of the day is—let’s remember the important part: vote.

Off-year elections are happening. Midterms will be here in 2026. Presidential ballots will return in 2028. And while the Left is busy chasing ghosts and accusing anyone to the right of Bernie Sanders of fascism, there’s still a constitutional, sane, and effective way to restore balance: the ballot box.

The “No Kings” crowd may have passion, but they don’t have discipline. They don’t have vision. And after last weekend, it’s clear they don’t have the country. What they do have is a stranglehold on a party too scared to push back. And that’s something voters on the outside of the madness can—and should—take advantage of.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here