Hegseth Colleagues Comment On Report

Ah, NBC News strikes again with the classic hit piece formula: dig up a few “anonymous sources,” sprinkle in some sensational claims, and publish without hesitation.

This time, their target is Pete Hegseth, Donald Trump’s Secretary of Defense pick. The accusations? Allegedly being drunk on air during his time at Fox News. The problem? Their so-called journalism is already unraveling faster than a cheap sweater. Let’s start with the obvious: anonymous sources are the backbone of every dubious smear campaign.

According to NBC, Hegseth’s colleagues at Fox News “smelled alcohol” on him “more than a dozen times” and heard him mention being hungover. Intriguing allegations, sure. But when you dig into the details—or lack thereof—it’s clear this is more about optics than facts. For one, how exactly does one smell “alcohol” through the layers of studio lights, makeup, and coffee? If we’re relying on that level of forensics, NBC should stick to covering celebrity perfume launches.

What makes this particularly galling is the chorus of on-the-record denials from people who actually worked alongside Hegseth. Fox News’ Will Cain didn’t just defend Hegseth; he obliterated the report, calling it “horsesh*t” and inviting NBC to name a single credible source with evidence. Then there’s Rachel Campos-Duffy, Lisa Boothe, Dan Bongino, and even former producers like Breanna Morello—all of whom outright dismissed the claims as baseless. These are people who logged real hours with Hegseth, not shadowy figures making offhand remarks from the safety of anonymity.

But the pièce de résistance came from Clay Travis, who pointed out a glaring issue with NBC’s narrative: early morning TV is brutal. Anyone who has ever hosted a morning show knows it’s a grind. If Hegseth were struggling with alcohol issues, it would’ve been impossible to maintain such a demanding schedule for years without it becoming glaringly obvious.

Of course, NBC wasn’t satisfied with one weak hit piece. Enter The New Yorker, which tried to double down with claims of Hegseth being intoxicated while leading Concerned Veterans for America years earlier. But their evidence? A so-called whistleblower report conveniently provided by a “disgruntled former associate.” Hegseth’s lawyer didn’t mince words, calling the story what it was: petty, jealous, and utterly devoid of credibility.

The timing of these attacks is also worth noting. With Hegseth poised to take on a high-profile role, the media’s knives are out, desperate to undercut his credibility. The fact that NBC hasn’t updated its story with the growing list of public defenses speaks volumes about their agenda. If the goal were objective journalism, wouldn’t they at least acknowledge the overwhelming pushback from people with firsthand knowledge of Hegseth’s work ethic and character?

What we’re seeing here is a microcosm of a larger trend: a media landscape where narrative often trumps truth. Pete Hegseth’s real “crime” isn’t what NBC claims—it’s his unabashed conservative stance, his military background, and his commitment to values that don’t align with the coastal elite’s playbook. These stories aren’t just about him; they’re about sending a message to anyone who dares challenge the establishment.

So, what’s next? NBC will probably ignore the backlash, hoping the initial smear sticks in the public’s mind. But Hegseth’s defenders have done a remarkable job of fighting fire with fire, proving once again that the truth has a funny way of surfacing—no matter how much mud is thrown on it.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here