Let’s dive into some recent remarks made by Vice President Kamala Harris during a campaign stop in Pennsylvania. Now, Harris is no stranger to public speaking, but occasionally, her speeches take a turn that leaves people scratching their heads. This happened again recently when she tried to explain what the upcoming 2024 presidential election is all about and what the United States represents globally.
Here’s what she said: “Our election is about understanding the importance of this beautiful country of ours in terms of what we stand for around the globe as a democracy. As a democracy, we know, there’s a duality to the nature of democracy.” If that left you a bit puzzled, you’re not alone. Harris seemed to be emphasizing the significance of the U.S. as a democratic nation, both strong and fragile. But, her delivery made it hard to grasp her point clearly.
Kamala word salads are so back: “Our election is about understanding the importance of this beautiful country of ours in terms of what we stand for around the globe as a democracy. As a democracy, we know there’s a duality to the nature of democracy. On the one hand, incredible… pic.twitter.com/GeMmgVESFk
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) August 18, 2024
This isn’t the first time Harris has been noted for what some call “word salads.” These are speeches where she uses complex phrases or roundabout explanations for what could be simpler ideas. For instance, back in March 2022, during a speech in Louisiana, Harris discussed “the significance of the passage of time” in a way that left many wondering what exactly she meant. Similarly, during a visit to Poland, she spoke about standing on “the northern flank, on the eastern flank,” which didn’t quite clarify her position or point.
Recently, during an unscripted moment while talking about a prisoner swap with Russia, she said, “This is just an extraordinary testament to the importance of having a president who understands the power of diplomacy and understands the strength that rests in understanding the significance of diplomacy.” Again, the message got a bit tangled in her words.
